Masoud Alvand; Morteza haji Hosseini; Amir Karbasi zadeh
Abstract
classical logic has had some problems in explaining issues such as semantic paradoxes, vagueness problem, and quantum phenomena and have led logicians to seek non-classical logical formulations in which such problems do not arise. However, the undeniable growth of mathematics and its widespread influence ...
Read More
classical logic has had some problems in explaining issues such as semantic paradoxes, vagueness problem, and quantum phenomena and have led logicians to seek non-classical logical formulations in which such problems do not arise. However, the undeniable growth of mathematics and its widespread influence in other disciplines has often led non-classical logicians to emphasize adherence to mathematical reasoning with the principles of classical logic by separating mathematical reasoning from non-mathematical. Against this approach, Williamson shows that the strategy of separating mathematics from non-mathematics and adhering to non-classical logic in non-mathematical fields disrupts the applicability of mathematics, and non-classical logicians need to think about solving this problem. In this essay, while expressing Williamson's arguments on the tension between advocating non-classical logic and the applicability of mathematics and emphasizing some of them, we show that, unlike Williamson, scientific activity based on deductive inference does not follow classical logic completely and therefor the tension sometimes subsides.
Ismael noshad; Morteza haji Hosseini
Abstract
The debate of Abu Sa'id Syrafi Nahwi and Abu Bashar Mata is one of the key nodes of Islamic civilization.This debate was the focus of the two main streams that arose from the Abbasid ideological reform. One-way Translation Movement and its implications and other way ideological and theological and jurisprudential ...
Read More
The debate of Abu Sa'id Syrafi Nahwi and Abu Bashar Mata is one of the key nodes of Islamic civilization.This debate was the focus of the two main streams that arose from the Abbasid ideological reform. One-way Translation Movement and its implications and other way ideological and theological and jurisprudential systems, generated in Age of Editing. Apart from serious issues regarding the position of logic and the relation between logic and language and syntax, this debate drives the tension caused by the collision of the two above-mentioned flows.In this paper,with the historical and genealogical descriptions of the Translation Movement and the Age of Editing, we go to discursive analysis of the debate, and explain this ideological tension. It seems that the results of this debate have also had a wide range of implications for Islamic thought, and have had sustained changes in both the ideological and philosophical trends. After debate, the ideological stream left out the former enemy with logic and attracted logic for use.The philosophical flow was also diverted from logics and went to the foundations that Farabi and Avicenna called peripatetic school.
